New Ben
17 Employer Review(s)
Colleagues:
Supervisor:
Tasks:
Salary:
Career:
OVERALL:
Location
#
Country
Date
Rating
Review
Düsseldorf 1
19.01.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Problematic management style. Acceptable service. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Employers with criticisms.
Frankfurt a. M. 2
10.03.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Problematic management style. No filling operation. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Frankfurt a. M. 3
13.05.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Problematic management style. No filling operation. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Not recommendable employer.
Frankfurt a. M. 4
16.08.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Fair payments. Average recognition. Employers with criticisms.
Frankfurt a.M. 5
22.12.2008
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Problematic management style. Mere Work carried out. Demotivating income. Rare upgrades. Employers with criticisms.
Frankfurt a.M. 6
02.03.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent work atmosphere. Impeccable Leadership. Excellent activity. First class salary. Best career opportunities. Excellent employer.
Frankfurt a.M. 7
28.04.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Problematic management style. Mere Work carried out. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Frankfurt a.M. 8
01.10.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Problematic management style. Mere Work carried out. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Not recommendable employer.
Frankfurt a.M. 9
23.11.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Need to improve personnel management. Acceptable service. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Not recommendable employer.
Frankfurt a.M. 10
02.03.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Recommendable workplace.
Frankfurt a.M. 11
20.03.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Need to improve personnel management. Reasonable job provider.
Frankfurt a.M. 12
22.11.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Problematic management style. Mere Work carried out. Demotivating income. Average recognition. Employers with criticisms.
Frankfurt a.M. 13
09.03.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Problematic management style. Filling employment. Demotivating income. Beneficial career. Not recommendable employer.
Germany 14
01.03.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 15
09.03.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Paderborn 16
30.08.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Satisfactory staff work. Filling employment. Demotivating income. Average recognition. Recommendable workplace.
Paderborn 17
26.06.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Problematic management style. Acceptable service. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.